Evaluation of access and participation plans: Understanding what works

We present an analysis of two current policy options to improve evaluation access and participation work: independent external vs. in-house evaluation. Evaluation work needs be well-conducted, objective widely disseminated, regardless the outcome. Independent is likely provide objectivity right skills, but providing effective timely feedback may prohibitively expensive. Without support, practitioner teams risk lack skills. Neither nor solve issues publication bias; usage open science principles could help. Working with academics other experts internal institution skills well under framework. as a sector avoid duplication effort get us further, faster.